How does AI improve TARA delivery?

AI multi-agent systems generate threat scenarios in hours not weeks, with human-in-loop SME validation — 90% time reduction.

What is the difference between TARA and HARA?

TARA covers cybersecurity threats (ISO/SAE 21434); HARA covers functional safety hazards (ISO 26262). In SDVs both must be integrated.

AI Strategy · Compliance Platform · Talent Transformation For OEMs & Tier Suppliers

Book a Demo

Concept to SOP · First Time Right · APQP · ISO 26262 · ISO/SAE 21434

Protect Your SOP Date.
First Time Right
at Every Gate.

The fastest OEMs now launch a new vehicle in about 20 months.^† Matching that pace without cutting validation means no late surprises. UnifyIQ connects Design, Quality, Supplier and Compliance on one platform — so every issue is caught at the gate it belongs to, not at the build.

Rework we prevent
PPAP resubmission
TARA / HARA rework
Drawing misreads at supplier
Tolerance stack-up surprises
ECN / design-change delays

Assess Your Launch Risk Explore Our Services →

39%

of vehicle programs reach SOP with open fitment, quality or serviceability issues^*

20 vs 48 mo

Development cycle — fastest new-energy OEMs vs legacy automakers^†

40–60%

of build-stage disruptions avoidable with early validation^*

* Survey of 57 senior executives (41 OEM CXOs, 16 Tier-1 leaders), India. Source: Vector Consulting Group, “The Race is Won in the Pit Stop”.
† Source: AlixPartners, Global Automotive Outlook 2024.

Is an upcoming SOP date at risk? Let's talk. Write to us — we respond within one business day.

Sales sales@unifyiq.ai Support help@unifyiq.ai

The Moment We're In

Launch Delays Rarely Start at SOP. They Start at an Earlier Gate.

A drawing note a supplier reads differently. A design change that never reached the supplier. A PPAP element found missing at review. A cybersecurity requirement that surfaces at type approval. Each is small when it is created — and expensive by the time it is found.

Software-defined vehicles, new regulations and faster competitors have added more gates and less time between them. UnifyIQ was built to make every gate pass first time — across Design, Supplier, Quality and Compliance.

See the platform

$200M

Cost of a single 12-month launch delay to an OEM

Up to $15M for a supplier. Lost sales, extra prototypes, late design changes and cascading supply-chain disruption.

Source: PwC, 2023

9–15

Months — typical launch lag behind schedule in India

Complex programs regularly slip 18–24 months. Senior OEM and Tier-1 leaders trace the cause to gaps at the design stage.

Source: Vector Consulting Group

Months AI can take out of a five-year development cycle

Through AI-driven design and testing, with up to 20% lower verification and validation cost.

Source: AlixPartners, 2025

The UnifyIQ Platform

Four Pillars. One Thread from Concept to SOP.

Each pillar owns a gate where launches typically slip. Together they give Design, Supplier, Quality and Compliance teams one shared view of what is ready — and what is not.

Gate · Design Release

DocIQ

Design Intelligence

Turns native CAD and drawings into a clear, verified design bundle — readable 2D drawings, notes and tolerances, every value checked against the source. OEMs release it; suppliers build from it.

CATIA V5 2D drawings Note translation Tolerance stack-up

How it works

Gate · Sourcing & APQP

SupplierIQ

Supplier Risk Intelligence

Replaces spreadsheet APQP trackers with one live view of every supplier and part — and flags which deliverables are at risk of slipping before they hit the plan.

APQP tracking Supplier risk Delay forecast Leadership view

How it works

Gate · PPAP Approval

PPAP

Submission Readiness

Reads PPAP packages against all 18 AIAG elements, scores completeness and lists the gaps — so packages are fixed before submission, not after rejection.

18 AIAG elements AI extraction Gap analysis

How it works

Gate · Type Approval

ComplianceIQ

TARA & HARA — HATARA

AI-assisted TARA and HARA with human SME validation, traceable from asset to requirement — and evidence packs formatted for ARAI and ICAT submission.

ISO/SAE 21434 ISO 26262 UNECE R155 AIS-189

Explore ComplianceIQ

To adopt it well AI Strategy — AI Catalyst roadmaps & governance Talent Transformation — AI upskilling, CxO to engineer Talk to us →

For Suppliers

Get It Right on the First Submission.

Your OEM's SOP date is your deadline too. The same platform helps Tier-1 and Tier-2 suppliers read requirements correctly and submit evidence that is accepted first time.

Read the OEM drawing right DocIQ

Clear notes, translated where needed, with every value and tolerance checked against the original — before first samples, not after.

Self-check PPAP before you submit PPAP

Your package checked against all 18 AIAG elements, with gaps listed — so it is closed in-house, not returned by the customer.

Meet safety & cyber requirements ComplianceIQ

TARA and HARA evidence for your part, traceable to the ISO 26262 and ISO/SAE 21434 requirements your OEM sets.

Talk to us about your next submission

★ How It Works

One Digital Thread. First Time Right at Every Gate.

Launches slip when a problem is created at one gate and found at a later one. UnifyIQ links design, supplier, quality and compliance data, so each gap is visible at the gate where it is created — when it is still a fix, not a delay. AI does the first pass; your engineers and our SMEs make the call.

Solution pillars

AIAG PPAP elements

E2E

Concept to SOP

See the Full Platform

Design release · DocIQ

One drawing, read the same way by OEM and supplier — clear notes, verified values, and the safety and cyber requirements that apply to each part.

Sourcing & APQP · SupplierIQ

Every supplier deliverable tracked in one place, with at-risk parts flagged while there is still time to recover.

PPAP approval · PPAP

Packages checked against all 18 elements before they are submitted — accepted first time, whichever side of the review you are on.

Type approval · ComplianceIQ

TARA and HARA started at concept, traceable end to end, with evidence ready in the formats ARAI and ICAT expect.

Why UnifyIQ

Launch Problems Cross Departments. So Do We.

Four domains a launch depends on

Automotive Engineering & Quality

APQP · PPAP · IATF 16949 · CAD & GD&T · OEM & Tier experience

Safety & Cybersecurity

ISO 26262 · ISO/SAE 21434 · UNECE R155 · AIS-189 · TARA · HARA

Artificial Intelligence

Document & drawing intelligence · Multi-agent systems · LLM engineering

Data & Engineering

Knowledge graphs · Traceability · Risk analytics

⊕

A launch fails where these domains meet. That is where we work.

Built around the launch, not one department

Design, Supplier, Quality and Compliance work from one thread. A change in one shows up where it matters in the others.

Speed without skipping validation

AI takes the first pass on drawings, submissions and threat analysis. Engineers and SMEs make every final call — so faster never means less rigorous.

Grounded in the standards you are audited against

AIAG APQP and PPAP, IATF 16949, ISO 26262, ISO/SAE 21434, UNECE R155 and India's AIS-189 — built in, not bolted on.

OEM and supplier on the same page

We work with OEMs and Tier 1/2 suppliers, so what the OEM releases and what the supplier builds stay in step.

Platform, strategy and people together

The platform for execution, AI Catalyst consulting for the roadmap, and talent programmes so your teams own it after we leave.

AIAG APQP & PPAPAll 18 PPAP elements

ISO 26262 · ISO/SAE 21434Safety and cyber traceability

Human validation built inAI proposes, experts decide

OEM + Tier 1/2 readyScales across the supply chain

Thought Leadership

Insights for Automotive Launch Leaders

View all insights →

⭐ Featured · Launch

Why Launches Slip: The Late-Surprise Problem Behind Missed SOP Dates

Most delays are not created at SOP — they are found there. Where gaps start across design, supplier, PPAP and compliance gates, and how First Time Right closes them early.

8 min readFirst Time RightAPQP

Strategy · Speed

20 Months vs 48: Matching the Fastest OEMs Without Cutting Validation

What the new development benchmark means for Indian OEMs and suppliers — and why quality at every gate is the only safe way to compress.

6 min readStrategy

Compliance · ISO 21434

Why Manual TARA is Costing OEMs More Than Just Time

The hidden costs of spreadsheet-based threat analysis — from audit findings to delayed type approval — and the AI-assisted path forward.

5 min readCompliance

Key Questions

What Leaders Are Asking About First Time Right Launches

What does First Time Right mean in vehicle development? +

First Time Right means each development gate — design release, supplier sourcing, PPAP approval, type approval — is passed without rework or resubmission. It does not mean skipping validation; it means problems are found at the gate where they are created, when they are still a fix rather than a delay.

Why do vehicle launches miss their SOP date? +

Industry studies point to late detection. PwC found delays typically come from insufficient early risk planning and late discovery of problems, with production, supplier and quality issues the main causes. In India, Vector Consulting Group's survey of OEM and Tier-1 leaders traced typical 9–15 month launch lags to gaps at the design stage.

How does UnifyIQ help protect the SOP date? +

UnifyIQ connects four pillars on one platform: DocIQ for clear, verified design bundles, SupplierIQ for APQP tracking and supplier risk, PPAP for submission readiness across all 18 AIAG elements, and ComplianceIQ for TARA and HARA. Each pillar flags gaps at its own gate, so they are closed before they reach SOP. OEMs and suppliers use the same tools, so both sides work from the same facts.

What is TARA and why is it mandatory for automotive OEMs? +

TARA — Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment — is defined in ISO/SAE 21434 and is central to the Cyber Security Management System required by UNECE R155. Without a CSMS certificate, vehicles cannot obtain type approval in markets applying R155, including the EU, Japan and South Korea. India's AIS-189 follows the same structure.

How does ComplianceIQ support AIS-189 compliance in India? +

AIS-189 mirrors UNECE R155 structurally but differs on testing-agency mechanics — ARAI and ICAT expect evidence in their own formats, not the generic R155 template. ComplianceIQ generates evidence packs with full traceability between asset, damage scenario, attack path and cybersecurity goal, formatted for ARAI and ICAT submission.

How is AI used without compromising engineering rigour? +

AI does the first pass — reading drawings and supplier submissions, mapping PPAP elements, drafting threat scenarios. Every output is checked against its source and reviewed by engineers or SMEs before it is used. AI shortens the work; people remain accountable for the decision.

Let's Talk